Low-carbon + Union origin
The same qualifying volume must meet both conditions.
Follow a cement production-cost premium through the proposed 5% qualifying-volume rule and into final construction costs.
In covered public procurement and support schemes, at least 5% by volume of concrete or mortar—including its clinker and cement—must be both low-carbon and qualifying Union origin.
The same qualifying volume must meet both conditions.
The requirement applies in covered procurement and support schemes.
The detailed definition still requires implementing rules.
Separate excessive-cost thresholds apply to procurement (25%) and support schemes (30%).
The model starts with a cement premium, applies it only to the qualifying volume, then weights it by the selected downstream cost share.
These studies use different technologies and cost bases. Their ranges are shown for context and do not feed the core model.
Large-scale production
Mature-technology scenario
At least 80% direct-emissions reduction
Clinker cost, not delivered cement
Regional 2024 energy inputs
VUB — upper climate-friendly cement estimate
Both conditions apply to this same volume.
Open any source for the exact locator and what it compares.
The proposal has not been adopted. Future Construction Products Regulation acts will set the low-carbon classes. Origin follows the Union Customs Code and the proposal's partner-country equivalence rules.
The 20% estimate is kept as an optional preset; the VUB upper estimate of 78% is used in the core scenario. The Commission's 0.10% project estimate is shown separately because it is not derived from a cement-cost share. No separate origin cost is added in the core scenario, reflecting the impact assessment's supply assumption rather than a measured zero.
European large-scale production-cost range. It does not determine whether a product will meet the IAA's future low-carbon class.
The report defines climate-friendly cement by a large direct-emissions reduction and uses an older cement-price basis. The upper 78% production estimate and its 1.1% aggregate public-construction cost share are used in the core scenario; neither figure is a cement share for every individual project.
Clinker-cost effect of carbon-capture configurations, not a delivered cement premium or a legal-compliance estimate.
Production-cost range using regional 2024 energy inputs. The estimate excludes explicit carbon prices and policy support and does not vary non-energy capital or operating costs by region.
Peer-reviewed European mature-technology scenario. The implied range is rounded to 40–63%, and 50% is used only as an optional sensitivity.
Representative European downstream cost shares from a 2016 study. They are used as editable cost shares and do not describe every tender or project.
Trade volumes only. They do not provide a matched price premium or determine qualifying origin under the proposal.