Onshore wind

How Union-origin requirements could affect wind costs

Follow the cost effect from individual turbine components to turbine manufacturing and onshore electricity costs.

Core scenario

Component cost
EU-produced tower
25.5%
EU-produced blades
43.1%
EU-production cost premium(relative to using Chinese products)
Turbine cost
EU tower and blades
9.2%
All major components EU-produced
64.9%
EU-production cost premium(relative to using Chinese products)
Onshore LCOE
EU tower and blades
4.0%
All major components EU-produced
28.0%
EU-production cost premium(relative to using Chinese products)
01 · Wind turbine and IAA scope

What counts as a wind component?

The EU's official list of main wind-turbine components (adopted under the Net-Zero Industry Act) names the eligible parts. The IAA proposal would require one, then two, of these categories to be Union-origin.

Nacelle

The nacelle sits behind the rotor

It houses the drivetrain and electrical equipment. The list names the nacelle assembly as one main component.

Nacelle and rotor components

The list separates assembly from its component categories

The list also names the rotor hub, bearings, drivetrain and generator, permanent magnets and gearbox separately. Some sit inside the nacelle; the hub and pitch bearings form part of the rotor.

Blades

The blades form the rotor

Blades are a separate category in the list.

Tower

The tower supports the turbine

The tower is another category in the list and one of the lower-cost major turbine parts.

Onshore wind turbine anatomyA wind turbine schematic highlighting the nacelle.
Proposed IAA requirement

For wind energy, the IAA proposal would require some components to be Union-origin in public procurement and public auctions

From 1 year after entry into force until the 3-year pointAt least 1 component
From 3 years after entry into forceAt least 2 components

The proposal uses this list but does not prescribe a particular pair. The cost effect depends on which components qualify.

What counts as a main wind component →Official NZIA main-specific-component list
02 · The cost effect

A component price increase has a smaller effect on the full wind project

The example uses an EU-produced tower and blades. This is one possible pair under the proposed requirement; the proposal does not prescribe which two components must qualify.

Individual components

EU-produced components can cost considerably more

The IEA estimates that producing a tower in the EU costs about 25.5% more than in China, while EU-produced blades cost about 43.1% more.

Component production cost
EU-produced tower
25.5%
EU-produced blades
43.1%
EU-production cost premiumrelative to using Chinese components
The complete turbine

The effect becomes smaller at turbine level

In this illustration, the tower and blades are EU-produced. Their additional production cost is measured against the cost of the complete Chinese-reference turbine. The resulting turbine premium is about 9.2%.

Tower 25.5% + blades 43.1%, measured against the complete turbine

Complete turbine cost
Turbine with EU-produced tower and blades
9.2%
EU-production cost premiumrelative to using Chinese components
Electricity over the project lifetime

The effect on electricity cost is smaller again

Major turbine equipment represents about 43.1% of the lifetime cost of onshore wind electricity in this model. The 9.2% turbine premium therefore becomes an increase of about 4.0% in the levelised cost of electricity—the average cost per kilowatt-hour over the project lifetime.

9.2% turbine premium × 43.1% equipment share of lifetime cost

Lifetime electricity cost
Levelised cost of electricity (onshore)
4.0%
EU-production cost premiumrelative to using Chinese components
Core illustrationEU-produced tower and blades
Component production cost
EU-produced tower
25.5%
EU-produced blades
43.1%
EU-production cost premiumrelative to using Chinese components

The component comparisons and the equipment share of lifetime electricity cost use the IEA's 2026 estimates.

Commission cross-check.The Commission's impact assessment estimates that an onshore turbine with two EU-produced main components has a 4% higher levelised cost of electricity than the same turbine with these components from China (EUR 48 versus EUR 46 per MWh). It does not say which two components.

03 · Interactive model & sources

Adjust the assumptions

Component premiums compare EU and Chinese production. Turbine and LCOE results use a Chinese-made turbine as the reference. Adjust the values and choose which parts should be EU-produced.

Core scenario

Assumptions

25.5%
43.1%
11.4%
77.6%
43.1%

Current selection: tower + blades. Turbine cost increase 9.2 percent; onshore LCOE increase 4.0 percent.

Wind cost results

Current scenario barsCore scenario
Component costEU production versus Chinese reference

Component cost increases

EU-produced tower
25.5%
EU-produced blades
43.1%
EU nacelle assembly, Chinese subcomponents
11.4%
EU nacelle value chain
77.6%
Choose which parts should be EU-produced
Nacelle production depth

Current selection: tower + blades.

Turbine cost

Turbine manufacturing-cost increase for the selected EU-produced parts

Selected EU-produced partstower + blades
9.2%

Cost increase relative to Chinese reference turbine

Onshore LCOE

Onshore LCOE increase for the selected EU-produced parts

Selected EU-produced partstower + blades
4.0%

Cost increase relative to using exclusively Chinese components

Evidence on this page

Sources

Component production costs and the onshore equipment share.

Proposed component counts for procurement and auctions, plus the 20% auction threshold.

Commission cross-check: onshore LCOE with two EU-produced main components.